Follow by Email

Thursday, December 10, 2009

21st Century Alignment Guy

I don't know about you, but sometimes I find all of the new technologies and toys out there a bit exhausting. I seem to be one of the few people I know who isn't racing to drop his cell phone plan to by an iPhone. Not that iPhones are bad, mind you. I just get a bit tired being "plugged in" all the time. That's one of the big reasons I don't blog as much as many with blogs do. I just need to get away from this machine every now and again. I'm a guy who likes to wander off into the woods for a few days just as much as I like being plugged in. I think a everyone needs to find the right balance for them.

With that said, the more and more I learn about tools that can keep one plugged in all over the place, the more it strikes me that what the tech geeks are saying may indeed be the case: we have only seen the beginning of this revolution. So, I think it is wise to hop on board and ride the wave so to speak.

I have recently been introduced to a flurry of new tools. Things like Etherpad, GoogleWave, Twitter, and Ning are all tools I'm trying to harness and use. Each of these has a purpose, and I think I'm getting better at choosing the right tools for the right purposes. Today was a case in point. I had online chats going in three different venues simultaneously, all the while updating a Moodle course and using Etherpad to collaborate with a colleague. It was exhausting, but not too fast either.

This has me wondering if, someday, there will be some open source, plug and play apps out there that I could use to build alignment tools with. I'm by no means a programmer, which is why I need to work with smart folks like that to do my work. And there will always be a place for programmers, I'm sure. But gosh, if there where some free apps out there I could use to build the things that are in my head, that would be outstanding. And I'm guessing that day is coming sooner than later. This could help keep costs down for end users, and hopefully allow them more flexibility, too.

We'll see how this revolution goes. I'm excited about it, though.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Moving Research into Classrooms: My Reflections

I just finished attending the Moving Research into Classrooms conference put on by the Center for Teaching and Learning out of the University of Oregon. Overall, I have to say I was pretty impressed, both from a conference hosting perspective, as well as from a content perspective. The CTL folks did a great job organizing the conference and making sure all of the logistical nuts and bolts went smoothly. It's one of those things where if it goes badly, it's easy to criticize. But if it goes well, you really don't notice it. So kudos to them for the production of a conference.

More importantly, I think this was a good conference. There wasn't a ton of new learning for me, but I definitely picked up several things in terms of content knowledge that I can use. The whole conference was based on four of the Practice Guides developed by Institute of Education Sciences, the research and evaluation branch of the federal Department of Education. I attended the Adolescent Literacy strand, and it was as I said very well done. I had several reflections throughout the last two days that I'd like to lay out here very briefly, in no particular order.
  • I didn't realize we knew so much about adolescent literacy. It's just not an area I spend a lot of time in, hence the reason I attended the strand. It's heartening to know there are some answers out there.
  • Although we know about about good instruction from research, the evidence isn't as solid or comprehensive as we would like it to be. At the same time, that does not excuse us as professionals working on behalf of children to disregard the research that does exist.
  • Relatedly, I grow increasingly weary of the debates about different instructional "philosophies" or approaches. Specifically, I find the arguments against direct, explicit instruction increasingly shallow. For a while now, I've felt like an apologist for supporting direct, explicit instruction. No more. When done well, it works. Any arguments to the contrary are simply with little to no merit in my opinion. I have yet to talk to someone who argues against direct, explicit instruction who can accurately describe what it actually is. I am renewed in my motivation to fight the good fight.
  • Tim Shanahan, an incredibly talented and widely respected educator, was today's keynote. Although I think his treatment of frequent formative assessment for students at risk for failure was a bit harsh and incomplete, I thought overall he was outstanding. He brought up one point that tied tightly with alignment, namely the importance of collecting and using "input" or "process" data. That is to say, data about instruction. Collecting and using alignment data fits the bill incredibly well here in my opinion. I was encouraged greatly.
Overall, as I said, it was a great conference. I look forward to processing it some more, and putting some of what I learned to use in my daily practice.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009


Welcome one and all. Or, at least those of you who found my blog. This blog is dedicated to my reflections on matters related to curriculum alignment. I will do my best to keep it updated regularly, though I have not yet decided how frequently that should be. I encourage all of you to leave comments on my blog posts. I hope you find this blog both interesting and helpful.